Transparency Report

How TrueView Works —
Our Full Methodology

We believe you deserve to know exactly how we reach our conclusions. This page explains every step — where the data comes from, how candidate positions are assessed, how your quiz answers are scored, and the known limitations of our approach.

🔒 No editorial agenda · Public data only · You decide
Step 01 — Data Collection

Where We Get Our Information

TrueView does not editorialize, invent, or infer positions. Every candidate stance is grounded in official public records. Our primary sources are governmental and nonpartisan — the same records available to any citizen. Here is exactly where we look:

🏛️

Congress.gov — Legislative Record

The official database of the U.S. Congress. We use Congress.gov to review every bill a legislator has sponsored, co-sponsored, or voted on. A candidate's voting record is the most direct evidence of their actual policy positions — not their campaign promises. We look at vote patterns across issue categories, bill sponsorships, and amendments supported or opposed.

→ congress.gov
📋

Official Campaign Platforms & Candidate Websites

For presidential and major candidates, we review official campaign websites and published policy platforms. We capture stated positions only — not speculation about future behavior. Campaign platforms are considered secondary to voting records where both are available.

📰

Official Press Releases & Floor Statements

Statements made on the House or Senate floor and official press releases from a legislator's office are considered authoritative. These are archived in the Congressional Record (via Congress.gov) and on official .gov websites.

→ Congressional Record
⚖️

GovTrack & VoteSmart — Voting Data Aggregators

We cross-reference our Congress.gov data with GovTrack.us and VoteSmart.org for voting record verification and issue categorization. These are established nonpartisan tools used by researchers and journalists.

→ govtrack.us  ·  → votesmart.org
Step 02 — Issue Mapping

The 10 Policy Categories

Every vote, sponsorship, and stated position is mapped to one of 10 core issue categories. These categories were chosen to reflect the issues most commonly cited by American voters as important to their civic decisions. No category is weighted above another by default — that weighting is determined entirely by you in the quiz.

💰 Economy & Taxes
🏥 Healthcare
🌿 Climate & Environment
🛡️ Immigration & Border
🔫 Gun Policy
🎓 Education
🌐 Foreign Policy
⚖️ Criminal Justice
🏳️ Social & Civil Rights
🏦 National Debt & Spending

Each candidate receives a position score of –2 to +2 per category, derived from the weight of their legislative and public record. A score of +2 means strong, consistent support for a direction. A score of –2 means strong, consistent opposition. A score of 0 means limited record or mixed/moderate positions on that issue.

Step 03 — Scoring Pipeline

How We Assess Candidate Positions

Once raw data is collected, we run it through a consistent assessment pipeline. The goal is to arrive at a clear, defensible position score for each candidate on each issue category — without introducing bias.

1

Voting Record Analysis

We pull all available votes from Congress.gov for each legislator and tag each vote to an issue category. Votes are weighted: a direct floor vote counts more than a procedural vote. Pattern consistency across multiple votes strengthens the position signal.

2

Sponsorship & Co-sponsorship Review

Bills a candidate introduces or formally co-sponsors are strong indicators of priority. We distinguish between sponsoring legislation (high signal) and co-sponsoring (moderate signal), and we review the actual text of major bills for issue alignment.

3

Public Statement Verification

For positions not covered by votes (e.g. for non-legislators, or on issues with no direct votes), we use official stated positions from .gov sites and official campaign platforms. Unverified quotes or media paraphrasing are not used as primary sources.

4

Recency Weighting

More recent positions carry more weight than older ones. A vote from the past 2 years is weighted higher than one from 10 years ago. If a candidate has publicly reversed a position, we note both the original and current stance.

5

Position Score Assignment

After the above steps, each candidate receives a position score per issue category on a –2 to +2 scale. Scores are reviewed for internal consistency before publication.

Step 04 — Match Calculation

How Your Quiz Results Are Calculated

When you complete the TrueView quiz, your answers and priority rankings are combined with each candidate's position scores to produce a personalized alignment percentage. Here is the exact logic:

Alignment Score = Σ ( Your Answer × Priority Weight × Candidate Score )
normalized to a 0–100% match percentage across all issue categories
A

Your Answers (–2 to +2)

Each quiz question maps to an issue category. Your answer — Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree, Strongly Disagree — is converted to a numerical value from +2 to –2. Questions are framed as policy positions, not leading statements.

B

Priority Weighting (Your Rankings)

After the quiz, you drag and rank which issues matter most to you. Your top-ranked issue receives the highest multiplier, your lowest-ranked receives the least. This means two people with identical answers can get different results based on what they care about — by design.

C

Candidate Position Score (–2 to +2)

Each candidate's score on that issue (derived in Step 03 above) is multiplied against your answer. When your position and the candidate's position align, the product is positive. When they diverge, it reduces the overall score.

D

Normalization to Percentage

The raw sum is normalized against the theoretical maximum score (perfect alignment on all issues at maximum priority weight) to produce a 0–100% match figure. A score of 100% would mean you agree with the candidate on every issue you weighted as most important.

Step 05 — Honest Limitations

What TrueView Cannot Tell You

Transparency means acknowledging what we don't know and what our system cannot capture. No matching tool is perfect. Here are the genuine limitations of TrueView:

⚠️ Known Limitations

Records vary by role. Presidents and presidential candidates who have never served in Congress have no legislative voting record. For these candidates, we rely more heavily on official campaign platforms and executive orders, which are weaker signals than voting records.

Nuance is hard to score. A candidate may have a complex, nuanced position on an issue that doesn't reduce cleanly to a –2 to +2 scale. We do our best to represent the overall direction, but you should always review their full profile and source links.

Positions change. Politicians evolve. We update profiles when we identify a documented position change, but our data may lag behind the most recent developments. Always verify with primary sources before voting.

Quiz questions simplify complex issues. Reducing healthcare, immigration, or climate into a handful of questions inevitably involves simplification. The quiz is a starting point — not a substitute for reading candidate platforms in full.

We are a small team. We do our best to be accurate and current, but errors are possible. If you believe a candidate position is misrepresented, please contact us at hello@trueview.us with a source link.

Questions & Answers

Frequently Asked Questions

TrueView is built to be nonpartisan. We use public government records as our primary source — the same data available to everyone. We do not take positions on which candidate is "better." We present their records; you form your conclusions. If you believe a specific data point reflects bias, we encourage you to send us the source and we will review it.
Match scores are driven by both your answers and your priority rankings. If you ranked an issue highly but the candidate has a mixed or opposing record on it, that will pull your score down even if you agree on other issues. A lower-than-expected score is worth exploring — it may reflect a genuine gap between a candidate's rhetoric and their record.
We aim to review candidate profiles on a rolling basis, with major updates before primary and general election cycles. Congress.gov updates daily with new votes and bill activity. If a major vote or position change occurs, we prioritize updating the relevant profiles within 2–4 weeks.
Your quiz answers are processed locally in your browser and are not sent to or stored on TrueView servers. We do not build profiles of individual users. Aggregate, anonymized usage statistics (e.g. which issues are ranked most important by users overall) may be collected to help us improve the platform.
Yes — and we actively encourage it. If you believe a candidate position is inaccurate or out of date, please email us at hello@trueview.us with the candidate name, the issue, what you believe is incorrect, and a link to a primary source. We will review and correct genuine errors.
We are currently focused on major federal-level candidates. Building an accurate profile requires substantial research, and we prioritize depth over breadth. We plan to expand our candidate database over time. If there is a specific candidate you'd like to see profiled, let us know.

Ready to Find Your Match?

Now that you know exactly how TrueView works, take the quiz with full confidence in what you're seeing — and what it means.

Take the Matching Quiz → Browse Politicians